Skin adverse events related to personal protective equipment: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a global pandemic that has spread all over the word. To avoid virus transmission, healthcare workers must wear adequate personal protective equipment (PPE). PPE associated with several side events, including skin reactions. The objective of this study was to summarize prevalence, type and risk factors for cutaneous adverse events related prevention measures them. A systematic review meta-analysis conducted using MEDLINE, Scopus EMBASE databases from conception 21 January 2021. All types epidemiological studies regarding were included. literature search identified 1007 references, 35 them met eligible criteria included analysis, representing 31 453 participants. media 75.13%. rate mask 57.71%, those gloves hand hygiene products 49.16%. Most common contact dermatitis, acne itching. most damaged anatomical regions nasal bridge, cheeks hands. duration wearing factor. Frequent handwashing, masks agents frequently N95 respirators harmful skin. Hydrocolloid use prevented developing masks. In conclusion, high. longer Using hydrocolloid could prevent injuries use.